We are human beings one of the social creatures living or surviving in this macrocosm. Social, normally we live in groups. Existence of a normal human being attains meaning with coexistence. Give it a thought. I am writing this blog for others also to read it. I am doing a work which is in reality because of others. Often we wear clothes because they are in fashion, even though we are not comfortable wearing it or wanted to wear something more comfortable which we don't. Many a times we talk with each other just for the sake of talking, just as we inhale and exhale air, we intake and out give thoughts. It is like a necessity for living. We buy stuff often just to show off to others. May be my achievement would lose its purpose if it is not admired by others. An award for an example? jewelery? Luxury cars? lavish facades of mansions?Give it a thought most of the things that are giving you happiness are because they let you influence others. Be it love or power, we need others. UBUNTU, I am because we are. What a beautiful and simple thought is ubuntu.
So, basically presence of others is the most important condition for the survival of a human being and consequently the development of the human race. Coexistence deserves respect. So, why we hate some people? Why we dislike it when we get any counter opinion? Why we just not appreciate a different thinking entity which is actually important for my own survival? Why we want to control everything? Because if relativity is lost then even I can not confirm the absoluteness of my own existence. Then why? Why can't we just accept it and be happy about it. Rather than getting frustrated, angry, sad and low. But something like this is possible only when the counterpart also adheres to this philosophy. When the counterpart would not try to change me, my ways, my pattern, traits, marks and vibrations. But how often do we get into such a dilemma or quandary which results into a deadlock and a squabble. Is it always that we are aimed at and we are asked to make compromises. Are we always right?
There is beautiful theory which I learned in my Organization behavior course of Management education. Its called the 'attribution bias'. It says that people ascribe their achievement to their internal factors and their failures to their external factors, but while doing the same for others, they ascribe others' achievement to their external factors and their failures to their internal factors. Strange isn't it? But observe it. It happens. In my personal opinion no normal person is that damn insane that they can't be tackled with patience or with an open mind. My sole purpose of writing this blog is that just respect each and every other individual. Respect just because it makes your existence complete. Respect their thoughts their opinions. And there is indeed a difference between respecting and accepting. Open your mind, try and understand the basic reason for some one's behavior. But do try to relate it first with a positive reason rather than jumping straight to a negative one. By true nature nobody is a bad person, its just that they succumb to their surroundings. Shattered so much that to defend themselves they have closed their doors. And can you make an insecure person open the door with force? No. You can only break the door with force. You need love and patience to get that door opened. So, be happy, respect others, appreciate opposition and refrain negativity. You know the spelling of perfect is not perfect, I can spell it as Purfact also. Nobody is perfect, but we can at least be good.
So, basically presence of others is the most important condition for the survival of a human being and consequently the development of the human race. Coexistence deserves respect. So, why we hate some people? Why we dislike it when we get any counter opinion? Why we just not appreciate a different thinking entity which is actually important for my own survival? Why we want to control everything? Because if relativity is lost then even I can not confirm the absoluteness of my own existence. Then why? Why can't we just accept it and be happy about it. Rather than getting frustrated, angry, sad and low. But something like this is possible only when the counterpart also adheres to this philosophy. When the counterpart would not try to change me, my ways, my pattern, traits, marks and vibrations. But how often do we get into such a dilemma or quandary which results into a deadlock and a squabble. Is it always that we are aimed at and we are asked to make compromises. Are we always right?
No comments:
Post a Comment